The UK’s Supreme Court has ruled against Visa and Mastercard in a legal battle with retailers such as Sainsbury’s, Morrisons, Asda and Argos over the multilateral interchanged fees (MIFs).

The case, which dates back to 1992, relates to the MIFs levied on the retailers when cardholders make a transaction.

The court upheld an earlier Court of Appeal dated back to July 2018, to rule that the two payment giants restricted competition in the way they charged the retailers.

The Supreme Court revealed that the MIFs charged under Visa and Mastercard’s payment scheme was an unlawful restriction of European Union and UK competition law.

The ruling by Britain’s top court means that the retailers can now proceed to trial and claims compensation.

Sainsbury’s lead counsel Morgan Lewis’ partner Frances Murphy said that the retailers could potentially receive billions of pounds in damages.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Murphy said: “Sainsbury’s will now be seeking to recover the full amount of the unlawful charges it has incurred.”

Stewarts head of competition litigation Kate Pollock representing Morrisons, Asda and Argos said her clients “look forward to a swift resolution of the matter without further delay.”

In response, Mastercard said that the decision was not a final ruling and further hearings, which it expects to take place in 2021, will determine the nature of the key issues raised.

Mastercard said: “We continue to firmly believe that retailers of all sizes derive real value from our network.”

Visa said it was “disappointed that the Supreme Court did not agree with the previous High Court ruling that Visa’s UK interchange complies with competition law.

“Visa supports the decision to send the matter to a specialist tribunal so that the evidence can be properly considered.”